Governments and psychologists have been looking for ways to reduce crime in society for years. Some believe that all criminals have this right to benefit from education and rehabilitation advantages while they are in jail. This essay will argue that although this training can be beneficial for convicts, just some prisoners should be entitled to receive this education.
Most of the criminals suffer from lack of education since they are from the weak strata of society. Indeed, they commit the offence because there are no job opportunities for them. Throughout accessibility to an education and reclamation program, many juveniles and youthful who are in incarcerations because of a petty that perpetrated, provide this opportunity for them to learn a skill to apply it to find a job when they are released from prison. For instance, a result of a study that is done by criminologists indicates that only thirty per cent of adolescents who are sent to rehabilitation centres commit to offence after finish their imprisonment period. For these reasons, the existence of a training program is necessary for prisons who is expected to return to society as a legitimate citizen.
Furthermore, since governments always struggle with budget restrictions, it is significant how it spends. Some people argue that training courses and education offered to prisoners are a waste of taxpayers' money. They believe that a person who has spent most of their life by wrongdoing cannot be modified and the government should not spend money on training them. For examples, most of the offenders who are over 40 years old do not even participate in these rehabilitation programs. Overall, people are against the education program in jail because they claim this work is wasting money.
This essay discussed why the rehabilitation plan can be useful for prisoners who tend to have the right life after their release. In my opinion, although the training and reclamation program is indispensable for adolescents and youth who commit crime because of the lack of education which is there in society, this plan doesn't need to fulfil for all inmate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 321, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...on which is there in society, this plan doesnt need to fulfil for all inmate.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17052023121 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97847900188 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511560693642 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6361092787 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.266666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3029111459 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106623146455 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576532491093 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192384802455 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371401818914 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.