In modern scenario, unprecedented technological advancements have modernized the present generation. Numerous intellectual individuals consider that all vehicles on petrol and diesel should be banned and high tech electronic cars should replace them. According to my perception, discontinuation of fuel cars would definitely play an indispensable role to eliminate the pollution and preserve the ecological balance of nature.
Commencing the discussion, ban on fossil fuel vehicles would definitely be considered advantageous to eradicate the pollution. Besides, petrol and diesel cars produce extremely toxic chemicals like carbon dioxide that can prove detrimental for the entire humanity. Moreover, they cause catastrophic and horrendous circumstances for the patients especially suffering from heart disorders and breathing problems. For instance, according to recent research, approximately two lakhs people die every year due to polluted environment in India. Apart from this, fossil fuels play a pivotal role in increasing the pollution levels.
Further elucidating my perspective, electronic cars are considered to be immensely human and environment friendly. Besides, cars on electricity are tremendously more efficient and time saving. Moreover, this would definitely preserve the environment in order to maintain the pollution free Earth. For instance, developing nations like America, China and Japan have already set a remarkable example by introducing electronic cars and are enjoying their enumerable benefits. In addition to this, it would also assist to eliminate problems relevant to pollution from further exacerbating the atmosphere.
To recapitulate, technological achievements have always prove to be immensely helpful to the humanity. Ban on fossil fuel vehicles would play a significant contribution to preserve the environment as well as dire consequences due to harmful intoxicants. Moreover, electric cars are comparatively much more eco-friendly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the entire humanity. Moreover, they cause catastrophic and horrendous circum...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
... in increasing the pollution levels. Further elucidating my perspective, electronic ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'proved', 'proven'.
Suggestion: proved; proven
... technological achievements have always prove to be immensely helpful to the humanity...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, well, apart from, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.19565217391 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35367141373 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4676793512 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232630274935 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739898622794 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832279682253 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150933171867 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643825280565 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.38 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.38 12.4159519038 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.