All scientific discoveries should be shared among other scientists all over the world. Do you agree or disagree?
Scientific inventions brought so many changes in people’s life and people are greatly benefited by these research. The question which arise here that discoveries made by one researcher should be shared among others or not? I believe that discoveries particularly scientific must be shared with other related institutions or scientists.
Sharing these inventions brings so many benefits to world. First and foremost researches in field of medical science, life science and so on save the life of people by curing fatal diseases or prevent the disease to spread in public. Consequently, mortality rate reduced drastically and people’s health improved. For example, Ebola broke-out in Africa took so many lives and put the world on risk of spreading in other countries. Though invention took some time to encounter disease, newly launched vaccination by British scientists helped to improve Ebola patients in Africa and stopped spreading further. Also, discovery was also shared with other organizations to look into other aspects with regards to local conditions.
Secondly, everyone agree that inventions cycle is very long and lots of funds are spent for finding out new elements especially in astronomy, communication etc. If projects outcome and observation are shared then it not only prevent duplication at other places but also create platform to exchange views on same topic which may mutually help inventors and perhaps expedite the result. For instance, all developed country engaged in moon mission and only America have so far successfully landed at moon while others its seems to wastage of money.
To recapitulate, though discoveries are always costly and time consuming and inventor who first find out may not be happy to share but sharing these discoveries offers so many advantages to world. May extra funds or facilities be given to pioneers in research field to compensate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... medical science, life science and so on save the life of people by curing fatal ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41750841751 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88073456932 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632996632997 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0332621535 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.928571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246577763704 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811955677288 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733578447437 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147829978146 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600425235072 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.