Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world. However, these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science, technology and business.
Why do you think that is?
What could be done to encourage more people to take interest in the arts?
Art has been a dispensable part of human civilization since ancient time. Although, in this modern era, people move their attention to science, technology and business, and fewer people value art. Some causes for this ignorance can be identified, but there are some solutions which could help to turn this view.
There are two main reasons why the attention of people turned in to technical fields. Firstly, the life of the human, nowadays, totally relay on technical equipment and medicines. Therefore, they like to choose these fields instead of art. Even people are also encouraging their children to study these subjects. Not only, every work can be done with the knowledge of new technology, but also it is more beneficial for them than artwork. Secondly, these streams provide lucrative job opportunities to individuals while in the field of art, no one can build their future just by making paintings and all.
However, some solutions exist which can help to twist their view to deny art. Firstly, if the art is made compulsory subject in schools, then not only children but also parents can also able to understand the value of this field. Because of doing art activities, children can enhance their creativity and get help to boost their concentration level. Secondly, the government should host art exhibitions and distribute prizes to motivate individuals to participate in art activities. By doing so, the government along with artist can also get financial aid by selling handlooms, sculptures and paintings.
In conclusion, while nowadays people move to the technical field, by applying some efforts government switch people's interest in art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng handlooms, sculptures and paintings. In conclusion, while nowadays people mov...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'efforts'' or 'effort's'?
Suggestion: efforts'; effort's
...o the technical field, by applying some efforts government switch peoples interest in a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24719101124 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75726663976 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602996254682 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.18270292 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265322178618 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898394851403 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566652215661 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157444361513 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051597163338 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.