Art has always remained a source of inspiration for people and societies. Interestingly, many have expressed art as a repository of a society's cumulative memory; representing its culture, roots, traditions, history, and geography. But surprisingly, the future of art looks gloomy and I will discuss why that happened and how to revive it back, in the upcoming lines of this essay.
Primarily, with the advent of commercialization in the field of science and technology, people have now more gravitated towards it and that is the core reason behind the rapid development in this sector. Consequently, people nowadays have a little tilt towards art, as they consider it unproductive and a total waste of time. Additionally, due to the rapid development in technology, more media coverage is given to modern technology and very seldom so happens that any art exhibition make it to the news headlines. For instance, news of Facebook buying Whatsaap circulated in the main headlines repeatedly whereas no one knew about the national art exhibition being held simultaneously in five major cities of the country at that time. Therefore, little exposure has also furthered the gap between art and it's acknowledgement.
Presently, ameliorating the diminishing image of art among modern society is very crucial, requiring actions without further ado. Firstly, art exhibitions, displaying paintings and sculptures; Inauguration ceremonies of art museums etc. must be publicized on national and international forums; so that more and more media covers the event and art could reach the general public. Secondly, apart from the physical art activities in schools, pupils should be taught about the commercial aspects of arts so that they could plan their future in a field pertaining to arts. Lastly, governments should also roll up their sleeves to save their traditions and culture by keeping the art alive through compensation and partial funding of art projects.
To conclude, art has always remained a universal medium to communicate; abridging gaps among contemporary and ancient societies, over space and time. Therefore, it should be taken out of murky waters by means of the methods cited above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...overs the event and art could reach the general public. Secondly, apart from the physical art ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, apart from, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37971014493 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10957083725 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602898550725 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0944183032 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.733333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219856851519 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745617305191 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034517693674 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122174850891 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565040261998 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.