There is no doubt that pollution from vehicles have become huge environmental problems both in cities and on motorways everywhere. Someone may think that the government should increase the price of fuel to solve this problem.
To begin with, while it is understandable that private car is one of the main courses of the increase in pollution, higher fuel costs are likely to limit the number of drivers for long. The drivers would change their trip mode due to the high cost of the petrol. But as this policy would also affect the cost of public transport, the cost of the transportation will rise, so it would be very unpopular with everyone who needs to travel on the roads. Solving these problems is likely to need more than a simple rise in the price of petrol.
However, the severe environmental disruption doesn’t just caused by the traffic and there are various other measures which could be implemented that would have a huge effect on these problems as well.I think to tackle the problem of pollution, cleaner fuels need to be developed. The technology is already available to produce electric cars that would be both quieter and cleaner to use. Persuading manufactures and travelers to adopt these new technologies would be a more effective strategy for improving air quality, especially in cities. On the other hand, the development of high speed also affect the environment. The government official should concern about how to solve it as well.
In summary, I believe that increasing the level of taxation on fuel is only a short-term solution to just one environmental problem. If we wish to provide a home for our younger generation, we should to find a long-term and lasting solution to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...a huge effect on these problems as well.I think to tackle the problem of pollutio...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, while, i think, in summary, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93793103448 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79710228859 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562068965517 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.937121599 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.153846154 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188299575556 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682344768867 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550909253033 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119161446093 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322467765701 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.