In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with
other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes
the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
At an older age, people prefer to live at old age homes with the people like them where they assist by nurses very well. Expense behind this, sometimes paid by the United Kingdom government. One group of people have the perception that this kind of expense should be managed by their family whereas other groups want it to pay by the nation. I believe that expense should be pay by authorities. Reasons behind this are explained further.
One main reason is, whole life people paid tax to the government, now it is their duty to take care of the citizen. People obey their duty and funding to the nation for a long time from a younger age to an older age. Now, old people do not in a condition to work, so the government should support them by helping in there weak time by providing appropriate medical service and residential service. Moreover, if the people of old age is taken care of by ministry than they can get better infrastructure and health services. For instance, old age home has sufficient facilities and instant medical service on the spot which can not be available at home.
On the contrary, people at home can not find enough time to spend on them. If old age people look after under the authority services then they can live better remaining life. Family can not provide the same services which are given by the government old age homes. People sometimes failed to serve their duties towards their parents due to the lake of appropriate budget or negligence. If there is a law about home and health care facilities for older people than people can get the surety about proper life on older age.
Government is one of the crucial parts of the society to take care of citizen, so the expense on them is the government's responsibility.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... citizen, so the expense on them is the governments responsibility.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, for instance, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63782051282 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48102388874 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50641025641 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4678000974 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4375 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346152412032 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112958903534 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431596125387 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212281225439 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395634007428 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.