In a developed nation, like Canada, UK people go to old – age home because of neglection, busy life, isolation of the children. But here always a dilemma who should have pay attention to it. Is it the sole obligation of family or government? Let begin debate on it.
To embark upon, Government has abundant resources of finance which sufficient to meet the requirement of old people like health issues, mental illness and other chronic ailments. But in recent date, here is some alternation is made by the government in fiscal and monetary policy. Unfortunately, there is some serious variation reveal by the International monetary fund. As, there inflation rate is gone up, besides the cost of living index is rise by 60%. Perhaps, Old people have some finance but it is not enough to meet social and basic needs. However, the Government has more sources of finance like taxpayer’s money to contribute to mobilizing old age fund.
On the contrary, It is the ethic and moral responsibility of children to monitor, feed and take care of his/ her old parents as they have done in their insolence stage. In Britain, people are suffering from serious health issues. Approximately sixty percent of old age people who critically need medical care for sustainable living. The government should have to make radical provisions for the better survival of old people. Conversely, to entirely depend on government investment, putting the burden on the national budget family also should have to need to make a minor contribution.
In summary, although the government have huge resources to invest in well being of senior citizen. It is also prime and moral obligation of the family so that the burden on the national budget would be curtailed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by the International monetary fund. As, there inflation rate is gone up, besides...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, however, if, so, well, in summary, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03793103448 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84481922674 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.33321418 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9411764706 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272856500385 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789371309232 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535620678647 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148320889958 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725546046884 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.