Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years in the world that many cities now are "one big traffic jam". Do you think that this statement is true? What measure can government take to address this problem?
Past three decades have seen exponential surge in number of cars on the road in most of the cities in the world. As an outcome of this, traffic jam is one of the major concerns which urban world sneers at. However, government can certainly take steps such as increase in car prices, efficient local transport to curb this concern.
Big cities like Mumbai, Shanghai, London have been deplorably affected. Regular honking with traffic movement at snarl’s pace is a regular feature without which day looks incomplete. Importantly, rising population of metropolitan cities acts as a lubricant in the machinery converting the cities into nothing more than a traffic jam. It further increases the cost and time to travel in such cities. Additionally, underdeveloped local transport system is unable to sustain as an alternate mode of commute for the public.
To solve this grave problem, government can possibly deploy solutions like strengthened local transport system, increased car and fuel prices and enacting strict laws around more than one car purchase per family. This would make people think before buying and using the car thereby reducing the menace. To exemplify, Singapore has beautifully depicted to the world, the efficient transport infrastructure set up in terms of connectivity and reach further reducing burden from self and society. Such measures would not only instil faith in government but also would resolve the problem.
In conclusion, all round the world, rampant rise in cars have led to increased traffic jams. This fact is evident in major metro cities across the globe. This burden can be controlled by strengthening infrastructure, improving connectivity and slowing down the car sales.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...To solve this grave problem, government can possibly deploy solutions like strengthened loca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et up in terms of connectivity and reach further reducing burden from self and so...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35294117647 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84868352706 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643382352941 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9200296862 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288818661902 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862170858311 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447020722302 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171124282746 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434505836747 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.