Children can learn effectively by watching television. Therefore they should be encouraged to watch television regularly at home and at school. To what extent do you agree?
It is argued that kids can gain knowledge in a more effective way watching episodes on television. Thus, they should be stimulated every time to study through televisions in schools as well as at home. I completely agree, because thinks can be learnt easily through videography and remembered for longer time.
Firstly, watching programs on the television is the easy way to learn new things. Students can remember things for longer time as compare with reading it from books. In addition to that, seeing television does not require much attention, they can learn from such episodes with doing other activities also. From the studies, it has been proven that even dull students can improve their skills by watching it every day without taking much efforts.
Secondly, pictorial memory is the strongest memory to remember things for longer duration, therefore by watching classes on television is the best way to improve intelligence. Pictures have been always helpful for the viewer to remember things by creating imagination in his mind while watching activities on the television. From the survey, it has been proved that video visuals with voice are stronger memories as compared with reading study topics.
In conclusion, although there are other ways of learning as well but learn from television source is excellent and more productive for kids. Hence, I believe that students should be motivated to learn subjects from videography with the help television. It is irrefutable that in near future the education system will have more digital displays as compare to human tutors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 300, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ch episodes with doing other activities also. From the studies, it has been proven t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 432, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...by watching it every day without taking much efforts. Secondly, pictorial memory is...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22745098039 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65107900965 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1875348639 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.538461538 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261239336798 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958849598608 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707511777973 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161565529328 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754830994363 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.