Children spend more on computers rather than their peers. What are the effects and solutions?
One of the most contemporary issues that receive concerns from various parts of the world is an alarming rate of using computers at the early age. It is a fact that there has been an increasing number of children who allocate more time to computers than those at the same age. In the following paragraphs, the problem would be analyzed with some plausible solutions being suggested.
It can be undeniable that using the computer at the early age have adverse impacts on children. To begin with, addiction to computers for a long time may be associated with serious diseases including impaired vision or obesity which affects intelligence development. Moreover, children may unintentionally gain access to negative contents on the Internet such as violence or pornography which launch them onto the path of crimes. Finally, allowing children to approach technology at the early age can be one of the main reasons push them into the anti-social status that is related to autism, or illusion.
To avoid this problem worsening, some reasonable steps should be implemented. First, it would be a worthwhile idea if authorities should have a strict control program that is existed on the Internet. Second, It is high time schools had a deep awareness of the disadvantages of computer abuse influencing children’s minds at first. Third, it is advisable for parents to provide more outdoor activities for their children. Last but not least, it is highly desirable that parents should spend time with their children such as having a weekend party or organizing a short trip together to thoroughly understand each other.
In conclusion, this issue could result in several serious consequences which require immediate attention. Only when the government and individuals make concerted efforts could this problem be efficiently handled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, while, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29109589041 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92236082866 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619863013699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8592651579 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169271388582 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569144766175 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552648153059 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925059287377 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592636736682 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.