In companies promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company not to someone from outside or new hiring, do you agree or disagree.
Promotions are events that every employee looks forward to receiving as it not only acknowledges a persons’ hard work but also raises the stature of one. Although every employee looks forward to reaching the top, I firmly believe organizations should hire new members rather that appointing someone from within, for such high positions. In the following essay, I will put for the reasons for my opinion.
To begin with, hiring people for higher positions is very beneficial for the organization in several ways. Firstly, they will bring about fresh ideas to the system which will propel the company further on the roads of success. As he or she will be new to the norms and culture of the company, they can easily pin point the flaws and issues that needs to be dealt with. Moreover, he or she will not be affected by favouritism or grudges and can judge every person appropriately which will help the management get a better understanding. In addition, this will avoid tension and discontentment among other employees.
However, appointing a person from outside has its demerits too. The person will take some time to understand the rules and regulations and adjust accordingly, which would have been relatively easier for any person within the organization. Some long term employees may feel dejected, thinking that all their hard work was worth naught. But these feelings are subjective to fade out soon if the management acknowledges the employees skills and comfort them with rewarding incentives for their hard work. Besides, employees from within the organization will have a tendency to overlook the flaws as they are used to the system.
In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that hiring new personnel for higher positions is far more beneficial to the organization as it will bring about a surge of better change and not be overshadowed by previous judgments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d discontentment among other employees. However, appointing a person from outsid...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, as to, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08387096774 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8121484634 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587096774194 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4257141978 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166212832974 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553851435945 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490664942381 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100926286943 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286588575502 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.