In companies promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company not to someone from outside or new hiring, do you agree or disagree.
The right recruitments and promotions are a highly integral part of many organizations. Certain demographics hold the statement that promoting the employees from inside the company can have better results as compared to hiring new staff for senior hierarchy. I completely agree with the assertion as internal employees can have more in-depth knowledge about the nature of work.
First and foremost, existing employees can perform senior roles more effectively. They have thorough experience of company culture and working style. That is why they are more suitable for that position as they were already assisting their seniors for the same role. Google, for instance, promoted Sundar Pichai to CEO as he was an old employee and had a better understanding of Google’s working environment. Now he is leading the organization to a level where it was never before.
On a further note, it motivates the internal staff to work to the fullest of their potential during the tenure of service. They provide their best services to the company in the hope to get rewarded in the form of promotion and salary increments. As a result, both parties, employees, and companies get to benefit from it.
Conversely, external hiring can be a requirement for some organizations. Especially, audit firms like Price water coopers, KPMG, and Deloitte have to make sure the integrity of top management. Therefore, they prefer to hire professionals from outside to avoid any possible inherent threat to the audit process of many government and non-government organizations. Otherwise, it is in the best interest of companies and staff to hire internally for top positions.
The conclusion to be drawn is that promotion from inside the organization brings most of the time better outcomes for employees as well as companies; however, few organizations like audit firms have requirements to hire external professionals for their smooth and trustworthy services.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun government seems to be countable; consider using: 'many governments'.
Suggestion: many governments
...inherent threat to the audit process of many government and non-government organizations. Other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35504885993 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07136934237 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563517915309 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1650951636 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242404987151 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765399496325 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607492111987 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137098001284 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053911328469 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.