In companies promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company not to someone from outside or new hiring, do you agree or disagree.
Promotions represent events that every employee looks forward to receiving as it not only acknowledges a persons’ hard work but also elevates the stature of one. Although every employee looks forward to reaching the top, I firmly believe organizations should hire new members rather that appointing someone from within, for such high positions. In the following essay, I will put for the reasons for my opinion.
To begin with, hiring people for leading positions is extremely beneficial for the organization in several ways. Firstly, they will bring about novel ideas to the system which will propel the company further on the roads of success. As he or she will be unaccustomed to the norms and culture of the company, they can easily pin-point the flaws and issues that need to be dealt with. Moreover, he or she will not be affected by favouritism or grudges and can evaluate every person appropriately which will help the management acquire a more thorough understanding. In addition, this will avoid tension and discontentment among other employees.
However, appointing a person from outside has its demerits too. The person will take some time to understand the rules and regulations and adjust accordingly, which would have been relatively easier for any person within the organization. Some long term employees may feel dejected, thinking that all their hard work was worth naught. But these feelings are subjective to fade out soon if the management acknowledges the employees skills and consoles them with rewarding incentives for their efforts. Besides, employees from within the organization will have a tendency to overlook the flaws as they are used to the system.
In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that hiring new personnel for higher positions is far more beneficial to the organization as it will bring about a surge of better change and not be overshadowed by previous judgments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion. To begin with, hiring people for leading positions is extremely benefici...
^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hiring people for leading positions is extremely beneficial for the organizatio...
^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ral ways. Firstly, they will bring about novel ideas to the system which will pro...
^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e roads of success. As he or she will be unaccustomed to the norms and culture of...
^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fected by favouritism or grudges and can evaluate every person appropriately whic...
^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opriately which will help the management acquire a more thorough understanding. ...
^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich will help the management acquire a more thorough understanding. In addition...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, as to, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21682847896 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88389647032 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598705501618 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5581276987 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161778290132 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532946896962 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486193350379 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978448344104 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294622341112 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.