Some parents believe that watching TV and playing computer games should be limited and substituted by reading books. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
The debate whether reading books is more beneficial than watching tv and playing computer games has been a popular topic of discussion among guardians for ages. I personally support the former option when compared with the latter. In the following paragraphs, I will put forth the reasons for my opinion.
To begin with, reading books have several benefits. It aids in the psychological development of the mind by improving concentration and focus. The description in stories will stimulate the imagination power. In addition, children will be able to gather more knowledge that will be helpful for their studies. Moreover, reading acts as a form of relaxation. For example, a child can learn new words which further enhances their vocabulary and will help them score better results in their academics.
However, the preference of watching tv and playing games is also understandable. As children have to study, they remain glued to the books most of the time. Hence, reading books as a form of recreation does not inspire them whereas the colorful graphics of the ads and computer games attract them. But this eventually leads them to become more distracted. They may also be tempted to carry out actions they see which could be quite dangerous if they are not around elders. The flashy ads and games also have an impact on their vision, causing them to wear glasses from an early age.
In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that reading books can help children learn new information whereas watching tv and playing games will do more harm than good. These will eventually become a reason for distraction and affect their vision.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04779411765 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66444200339 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584558823529 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5520910937 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7647058824 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198951760626 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619754525882 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702632340301 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130083313712 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393066519992 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.