Some parents believe that watching TV and playing computer games should be limited and substituted by reading books. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
In the contemporary society, with changing times the way by which a child learns new things have changed. Although guardians emphasise that reading books will be more beneficial for their children rather than watching tv or playing computer games, I firmly disagree with the notion. In the following paragraphs, I will put forth the reasons for my opinion.
To begin with, tv programs designed for kids have become more creative and interesting. There are several shows that telecast science experiments, fun games and dance performance which effectively grasps a child’s attention. As a result, they tend to watch these very attentively and remember them long after the show has ended.
Moreover, there are several games that also facilitate further enhancement of their learning abilities. Playing complex games requires a lot of attention to the settings and controls which is mandatory to gain a win. In addition, through games they are able to interact with people from different places which further enhance their communication skills.
However, these can prove to become overwhelming and lead them astray. For example, the fight scenes in a competition or games that are not meant for children under certain age. Furthermore, long-term staring at the screen many impair their vision at an early age. But with proper guidance from the parents these problems can be overcome. Also, as children have to study all day, reading books for recreational purpose feels monotonous to them and thus fail to attract any attention.
To conclude, I would like to reiterate that watching tv and playing games now play a bigger role in encouraging the children to learn new things whereas books fail to attract their attention. Therefore, parents should not restrict gaining know to simply reading books rather they should support and guide them in the right direction.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27759197324 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67458593377 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1162689326 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201517213563 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593837430367 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612630307152 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113987569592 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662281782911 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.