Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities. To what extent do you agree?
It has been a contentious issue whether industries are ought to render recreational facilities to local residents. This essay completely agrees with the view that companies are entitled to provide sports and public places as it would compensate for the damage they have done as well as create a conducive environment for the people.
As setting up a company takes up a substantial amount of land, it is imperative for companies to compensate for this geographical toll. Apparently, when any industry is set up, it usually takes away a lot of land which could have been utilized for the local community for recreational purposes. In order to pay them back to the community, companies have to build recreational centre so that people are not bereft of such facilities. Tata Steel, for instance, has built numerous public parks and meeting centres as compensation for the land resources they have required which maintains harmony with the local communities.
Apart from this, by building leisure complexes for the local people companies can over the harsh criticism they come across that might yield long term benefits for the business. In other words, if a business gets positive feedback from its locality and the census among people is on the good side, such business will procure more revenue as a result of increased productivity. For example, Papermate, a company that makes notebooks, spends 5% of its profit on establishing sports centres resulting in better political and financial standing.
In conclusion, this essay entirely agrees with the notion of companies constructing social and recreational centres for local residents as a reimburse for what they are taking along with a diplomatic decision to sustain the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eational centres for local residents as a reimburse for what they are taking along with a d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22857142857 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8679705546 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592857142857 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.902646142 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.4 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283453951175 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111980117046 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539408963185 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179759576271 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336241543261 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.