As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign language is a waste of time?
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In modern era, technological developments made human’s life quite easier and convenient than it was ever before. There is an ongoing debate between people who study new language that it is totally waste of time when we can translate different languages on computers easily; however, others oppose this decision. While learning new language has positive and negative developments, I entirely disagree with the statement that it is not waste of time.
On the one hand, when several gadgets and apps are available in the market to translate unknown languages, why do people need to acquire knowledge of different languages. In the fast-paced world, individuals do not have enough time to learn new languages, as they have different career goals which need to achieve on proper age limit. Therefore, it is better to follow the path you want to go rather than wasting precious time on foreign language. Moreover, there are multiple applications are available in market which will easily allow consumers to translate any languages whenever they require.
On the contrary, some people believe that it is not waste of time. Because learning new languages will always get to know about the lifestyle, culture and traditions of that foreign soil, these benefits are useful for life. If person learn about these different languages, it will improvise the cognitive abilities and surviving conditions on strange lands as individual does know the local language.
In addition, if one is unaware about the language when travelling to foreign land, person will easily feel nervousness and homesickness. So, it is better they learn about new languages and with these languages they can comfortably speak face to face with foreign people. Consequently, this conversation shall not remind one about their home and country.
To conclude, it is reiterated that in fast going world, there is no time to learn new language. Although, learning new languages benefit the person’s life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...there is no time to learn new language. Although, learning new languages benefit the per...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29936305732 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76501356455 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544585987261 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5915815968 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.933333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273313400519 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942380381279 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594303646241 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152041842467 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430226223587 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.