Countries are becoming more more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world
Is this a positive or negative development?
People, nowadays, can purchase the same products from anywhere around the globe which in turn creates the similarities amidst nations. I completely believe that this is an affirmative development due to several reasons. The possible reason is that people can procure wide range of varieties from anywhere as well as the economy of particular country will rise could be an another reason.
The first reason for the agreement is that, various manufacturing companies sell their products in different nationalities. That is to say, people can enjoy the perks of having numerous products which is utterly beneficial esspecially for the people of developing or underdeveloped countries. Consequently, not only people would be benefited bit various manufacturing companies would also get the opportunity to expand their business internationally. To illustrate, a famous clothing company Monte Carlo from The USA is incessantly spreading it's branchhes and on top of that people are also getting chances to wear clothes of that company. Hence, the argument is justifiable that it is a positive development.
The secondary reason to uphold this affirmative development is that the economy of particular countries would be augmented. This is because, if any particular company would set-up it's business in specific country then, that country would be profited in terms of money due to the purchasing capability of its inhabitants. As a result, the overall economy of the country would be upsurged due to the increased ratio of buyers of that particular product. For example, a famous cell phone company Apple has recently set-up its business in India and India public are incessantly buying iPhones which in turn helped to rose the economy of India. Therefore, the argument is substantiated that, it is an affirmative development to obtain same products from anywhere around the world.
I'm conclusion, spectrum of choices for customers as well as economical development of countries are two pivotal reasons why this is a positive development and it is recommended that, every government should patronize this scenario to proseperous economically.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | VishvAdthakkar | 73 | view |
- Rapping a woman is a heinous of crime. Some people think that it is a woman's fault while other believe that it is due to gender inequality.Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 61
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea some think they should be banned Do you agree or disagree 84
- You share a parking area with several neighbours and have recently started having problems explain Ghr problems suggesting ways to help situation proposing a possible meeting 72
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicines. Government funding should reflect this.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Being a celebration such as a famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits.What are the problems and what are the possible solutions. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a reason' or 'another reason'.
Suggestion: a reason; another reason
...f particular country will rise could be an another reason. The first reason for the agreement...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...cts from anywhere around the world. Im conclusion, spectrum of choices for cus...
^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...rum of choices for customers as well as economical development of countries are two pivota...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, as a result, as well as, on top of that, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46385542169 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12069706659 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512048192771 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8275167666 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.571428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215405885767 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793847646222 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426735939073 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136922215338 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239138678707 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.