In countries where unemployment is high, education should only be obligatory up to primary school and not secondary school. To what extend do you agree or disagree.

What separates human being from animals is education. An uneducated person is, more or less, same as an animal. A country, which has higher unemployment, has certainly both the options, either reduce educational obligations for employment or educate people to qualify for being employable. This essay will discuss both the sided one by one and will also explain, why educating people to higher level will prove better option.

In one hand, firstly, if more and more students will leave their studies at primary level, then they will remain unemployable for high skill job. So they will not be able to make more money and will financially be unable to send their children for better education. And this will become never ending cycle. Opposite to it, if government sponsors it's citizens fundamental education, accepted it will take some time, however it will be much beneficial in long run. Once people are educated, they can earn good money and can pay taxes, and from this tax state can further do other social works. These educated citizens will generate more and more employment and this way a country can come out of this grave situation.

On the other hand, increasing number of people will dropout of school at primary level only, there are higher chances that they might deviate to wrong direction. They might get involved in foul activities and consequently will become liability on state instead of an asset. Similarly being unaware of their rights and duties, hardly they will be able to contribute in country's growth.

In conclusion, education should be the fundamental right of every human being. So, the states overall the world should try to provide necessary education at least. This will not only will pull out the country from unemployment situation, but will also make life of it's citizens easier.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...liability on state instead of an asset. Similarly being unaware of their rights and dutie...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, similarly, so, then, at least, in conclusion, more or less, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 7.85571142285 318% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04304635762 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51551259291 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596026490066 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9177317395 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1875 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135612440888 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518125109227 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362430303405 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963454300194 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289202988726 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.