In countries where unemployment is high, education should only be obligatory up to primary school and not secondary school. To what extend do you agree or disagree.
Throughout the human history education has been considered as the key component to mitigate the economical issues such as unemployment. Restricting the education at primary level in order to support economy is unrealistic. Moreover, I strongly agrees with the notion that unemployment can only be eradicated from the economy through education, that is minimum secondary level. This essay will demonstrate impact of primary education and the significance of secondary education on unemployment.
To begin with, education is the movement from darkness to light. Enforcement of education till primary level will increase socio-economic issues like crime rate, poverty and illiteracy in the economy that is already struggling with unemployment; in long run. For instance, people working from tender ages for surviving and mitigate unemployment are more likely to adapt unethical and anti-social ways to achieve their desire. Admittedly, lavish life without secondary education and high paying job is almost next to impossible. Thus, consistent with this line of thinking, it is broadly believed that restricting education to primary level will deter individuals to attain quality of life for them and progressively increase unemployment and other factors which will hamper economic growth.
On contrary to this, providing avenues for citizens to attain secondary education will provide opportunities for them to grow and boost economy as well. Alternatively, unemployment ratio will decrease as well. For instance, India and Pakistan both got independence at the same time but still after 70 years, unemployment ratio of India is fairly high as compared to Pakistan. Economist observed that obligation of education till primary is the core cause of increased unemployment ratio. Precisely, mandatory secondary level education is the only factor for economic growth of Pakistan. Seen in this light, it is true that secondary education bring economic stability.
To conclude, obligation of education is not a constructive approach in an economy where unemployment ratio is high, rather it will give birth to severe consequences for the country. Hence, in light of above stated factors i am strongly inclined to the view that providing opportunities of education till secondary level will not only support in growth of individual but economy as a whole specifically, where unemployment is high.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ed as the key component to mitigate the economical issues such as unemployment. Restrictin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'agree'
Suggestion: agree
...my is unrealistic. Moreover, I strongly agrees with the notion that unemployment can o...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...Hence, in light of above stated factors i am strongly inclined to the view that p...
^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cifically, where unemployment is high.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, still, thus, well, for instance, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 34.0 8.3376753507 408% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2042.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65650969529 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11912341383 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520775623269 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7008152719 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.117647059 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20307876737 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804810469923 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404075987524 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148408693398 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312161423295 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.