As a country’s population grows, more new houses are needed. Is it better to build these houses in existing cities or to create new towns in the countryside?
Discuss Both factors.
Write at least 250 words
There is no harm in saying that topic attracts the attention owing to its uniqueness and versatility. There are two dimensions, to be clearer, two factors of this approach. Due to incremental growth in population, one aspect it to utilize countryside for building houses, whereas, a different perspective is to accommodate people in existing cities and countryside beauty should not be harmed. Let’s discuss both school of thoughts before reaching to a final verdict.
To begin with, in running days, growing population is biggest concerning factor. It is evident that owing to drastic growth in population, it is quite difficult to adjust people in existing cities. Many countries around the world facing a lot of problem with accommodation. Prominent countries are US, India and Hong Kong, where people are forced to live in 60 or 45 square fit apartment. Consequently, living standards are compromised. There is an urgent need for city expansion and building new houses as population growth is not an interim issue that is going to be solved after sometime. In order to avoid fatal situations in future, it is essential to take proactive measures by building new houses and apartments not only in cities but also at countryside.
On the contrary, using countryside for building houses would certainly have negative impacts on scenic views and different tourist’s attraction. This would eventually result in less tourist’s visits and less revenue generation from this stream. Keeping these core drawbacks of expanding cities to countryside, in my opinion, Government should plan to build apartments and flats to accommodate people within cities. Instead of utilizing countryside, Government should pay attention to substitutes for population accommodation, such as allotting certain square foot for single houses. Encourage people for apartment living styles.
To recapitulate the aforementioned argument, there is no denial that population growth and accommodation concerns related to this is an inevitable issue and it should be dealt with proper house planning of Government and masses. Using country side to resolve this issue is not appropriate and long lasting solution. Preventive measures should also be taken for population growth in first place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of problems'.
Suggestion: a lot of problems
... Many countries around the world facing a lot of problem with accommodation. Prominent countries...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'apartment' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'apartments'.
Suggestion: apartments
...e forced to live in 60 or 45 square fit apartment. Consequently, living standards are com...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ime. In order to avoid fatal situations in future, it is essential to take proactive meas...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, whereas, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51428571429 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08425891605 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577142857143 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8945011778 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.578947368 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201765517475 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05385770004 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543388990454 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117526861633 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047592137169 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.