With the development of social media, more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the internet in order to meet and chat with friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations. What solutions can you suggest to deal with this problem?
Due to the advent of social networking sites, an upward paradigm shift amongst young people, who prefer connecting with their peers over the world wide web, can be seen leading to many unforeseen circumstances. This essay sheds light on some solutions for the problem mentioned above.
First and the foremost, it is the prime responsibility of the parents to monitor the daily usage on the internet by their kids. Enlightening the young adults, about the potential drawbacks of chatting with strangers, need to be on top of their list while schooling them about social media. This way, they would be able to educate their pupils better, the pros as well as the cons of being visible on the networking world. Without proper guidance, it would be virtually impossible for a youngster to weigh between the good and evil. For example, in a recent survey, it was found out that the parents who are aware of the online activities of their children, find themselves in a much stronger position while educating the kids, than those who are unaware of the same.
A second way this problem can be met head-on would require total support from the companies who run these social networking sites, like Facebook, Whatsapp, Twitter. By making it their number one priority, the companies should focus on safeguarding its users, by implementing a mechanism which confirms the minimum legal age of the person registering on these websites. This way, it would protect the youth from the potential cybercriminals.
To conclude, by putting certain checks and conditions in place, it would be possible to safeguard the innocent young minds from falling into the clutches of online predators.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06498194946 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69366822489 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617328519856 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.429161744 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.545454545 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168784989922 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602590639674 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477805105574 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922194587919 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482963592161 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.