It is commonly believed that English will be the only language to be spoken around the world in near future, with the development of tourism. There are some advantages to having a single language globally, and there are some disadvantages too.
On the one hand, having one language will lead to one nation, and there won’t be any communication barrier between people. Everyone will understand what others say, and it will reduce conflicts between the different nations. Moreover, the business market will be affected by this highly, and the number of transactions per day will be increased by a significant number. Increasing business will lead to developing individuals, and consequently, all people will get equal opportunity. Not only that, anyone may able to travel around the world without any help of the guides.
On the other hand, when all people speak in one language, there won’t be any cultural changes. Most people travel around the world to experience cultural changes. Consequently, the tourism market will be reduced since there is no diversity to experience. Moreover, that cultural change will affect some countries very badly, and it will convert their lifestyle to upside down which can introduce unexpected problems to the world. In addition to that, there can be a community or a country who oppose this language change. That will result in a new war for an unnecessary problem.
In conclusion, even though the development of tourism contributed to English become most use language when all people speak in English tourism will disappear from the world. Diversity is very important to have a balanced world. There are plenty of advantages of having a single language around the world. However, it will lead to die other languages and culture from the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n a new war for an unnecessary problem. In conclusion, even though the developme...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18556701031 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77847749244 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498281786942 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8370012339 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7647058824 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473637102084 0.244688304435 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148445744066 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10177643879 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324107343322 0.151304729494 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116402171026 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.