Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers. Employers' organisations say that in a global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent.
What are your views?
Wage discrimination has always been one of the biggest conflicts between employers and employees. One of employees’ complaints is the huge salary gap between an ordinary worker and the director of a big company. In defense, employees state that this is necessary in order to attract the best ones in managing. I agree with this due to several matters which will be discussed in the following.
To begin with, from my point of view not only the gap between salaries is not outrageous but it is mandatory. What i mean is if a system wants to operate at it’s best, there should be a reward mechanism such as salary gap. The increase in payment will give the employees courage to work harder in order to get promotion, otherwise what is the point of hardworking ?
Moreover, the director’s salary increase is more of an investment rather than waste of money. That position includes big responsibilities and hard decisions which are they made wrong, it will cost the company pile loads of money, even bankruptcy. Thus, by payment increase, employees try to attract the best talents in order to avoid the loss and damage made by wrong choices and even making profit this way.
Last but not least, adding up the number on the director’s check, and even other hard working talented workers, is a choice used to be optional, but not anymore. What actually values the most in a company is it’s workforce and talents. In the global marker, companies try to steal these valuables from each other by offering better contracts including better salaries and thus , if one does not want to lose their valuable employees, it should consider a raise in paying them.
Consequently, paying more money to directors is an arbitrary matter in the global market. That will eventually result in keeping the good staff, making more money and having hardworking employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ot outrageous but it is mandatory. What i mean is if a system wants to operate at...
^
Line 6, column 387, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...racts including better salaries and thus , if one does not want to lose their valu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, if, moreover, thus, i mean, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98407643312 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82637812672 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582802547771 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2841643033 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250423780057 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802444343762 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464612119794 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123885110169 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328180202429 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.