It is a common observation that pupil tend to follow tutors more than their peers. I completely disagree with the statement and believe that they are influenced by their companions.
First of all, students spend majority of time together. To put it simply, they perform various tasks like projects, cultural activities and studying by forming groups. Furthermore, they do birthday celebrations and other parties with their friends, thus consuming major chunk of time with their mates in exchanging ideas, communicating and enjoying with each other.
Secondly, a person would always feel more comfortable in the same age group as compared to different age group. In other words, students are more open to share their concerns with their friends rather than teachers because of equal age groups having bulk of common interests or same mindset and thinking. For example, tenth grade student might not ask from his mentor about any experience related to personal life or related to studies, however he would definitely discuss his problems with his fellows.
Finally, students are more inclined doing things in the way they like, as they do not want to be obstructed in doing it. Since their childhood days, they come across with some suggestions in doing activities by their parents at home or teachers in school, which is generally logical as they have more life experiences and know how to do handle things better. In contrast, when doing some work with friends around those improvement tips are not there, making students more comfortable and happy, thereby promoting learning experience and having everlasting impact.
In conclusion, students ought to be impacted highly by their friends due to proximity in age groups, utilizing and working on activities together and doing minor jobs in a way they cherish.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 523, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
...e and happy, thereby promoting learning experience and having everlasting impact. In co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24657534247 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62366319427 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61301369863 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6972956439 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5833333333 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314670517141 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121993078075 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831899683143 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184802918451 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785690757372 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.