Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent developments ever will.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Technological advancements have the power to take the world by storm. It is not wrong to state that the earlier technological advancements had immense benefits for transforming the lives of people than the recent developments ever will. I agree that recent developments are not as effective as the past technological advancements.
Beyond any qualms there are a number of logical reasons to support the view that past developments were more beneficial than the current ones. In the previous era, newspapers, letters, telegrams and television news were the only means of communication worldwide. However, after the development of internet there was a complete revolution in global communication when people could not just converse but could even talk face to face by using video calls. For example, a distant relative living in America could easily communicate with his mother residing in India with the help of internet within a fraction of seconds. This resulted in making the life easier.
On the contrary the recent developments of social media platforms such as twitter, tiktok, facebook or instagram have brought about more risks than benefits. Not only social security of a person is compromised but the people are busy showing off their life on a fake social media platform when most of them are actually depressed and lonely. The suicide rate and patients of depression and bipolar disorder has almost doubled in the recent decade. For instance, people nowadays feel more depressed after comparing their lives with the online photos of their friends who seem to be enjoying their frequent international trips. With the advent of online classes for kids during this Covid-19 outbreak less social interaction and learning and playing in the comfort of their home is likely to increase these numbers of resulting depression among teenagers and kids. Although the life is a lot easier but it is equally depressing and monotonous.
In conclusion, I believe that while the previous advancements were for the overall benefit of the countries worldwide however, the recent developments especially the social media platforms are likely to compromise the social security and public relations of the people and thus prove harmful to everyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-14 | ankita.hpgdc | 73 | view |
- In the modern era social networking sites such as Instagram Facebook and Snapchat have become an essential part of our lives However a lot of people think that these social networking sites have detrimental effect on society and people Do you agree or dis 89
- It was predicted that people in the 21st century would have much more free time than in the past To what extent has this prediction come true 73
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 56
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30617977528 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86510657567 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558988764045 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8502003709 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.933333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227767740877 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775236804545 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866138177306 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149378785026 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817368223754 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.