Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people sugar consumption, while others think that it is individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Excessive intake of sugar is injurious to health. People’s opinion differ as whether legislative bodies should curbed usage of sugar as health is the people is of paramount concern for future of nation or people themselves are responsible for their daily dietary needs. Analyzing the responsibility of both government and the individuals will show this.
To start with, government established food and drug authorities whose prime motive is to check quality of food supplied to public. It is ought to be the legislative bodies responsibility to audit the eatables, their manufacturing process and contents well before it is offered to general public in order to make sure that health will not compromised. Evidently, in early 2019, Punjab food authorities of Pakistan have taken various measures and banned multiple products such as famous ice cream named Gourmet ice cream, united biscuits and many more. The underlying reason was high amount of sugar content in these products. Admittedly, healthy people develop healthy nation. Therefore, the approach that authorities should be liable for people’s consumption of sugar is reasonable.
On contrary, the concern that individuals are responsible for their sugar intake is not preposterous because deleterious effects of over consumption of sugar are directly affecting the individual’s health. Undoubtedly, government has to combat macro issues such as poverty, illiteracy and infrastructure. Hence, it is impractical for government to control huge population from adverse effects of over consumption of sugar. Hence, individuals must have to check their daily intake so they can remain healthy not only for their own selves but for their families also. In china, group of people started awareness campaigns for people, their multiple initiatives motivate people and presently one quarter of the population is practicing the sugar control dietary routine. According to the statistics, ration of diabetic people is decreasing drastically. Hence, it is agreed that people are responsible for their own health and must be responsible for daily consumption of sugar.
To conclude, over consumption of sugar is hazardous to health. In my opinion, the responsibility to control sugar intake is solely dependent on the individual considering the fact ill health will primarily impact them and their families and later these repercussions will be faced by nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bodies'' or 'body's'?
Suggestion: bodies'; body's
...blic. It is ought to be the legislative bodies responsibility to audit the eatables, t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...d contents well before it is offered to general public in order to make sure that health will ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'compromise'
Suggestion: compromise
...order to make sure that health will not compromised. Evidently, in early 2019, Punjab food ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...their own selves but for their families also. In china, group of people started awar...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, as to, such as, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61141304348 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09716693025 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516304347826 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1531610789 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.722222222 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329646733931 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120104892152 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799924456058 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225197253493 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811490317524 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.