Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people’s sugar consumption while others think that it is individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both views

Essay topics:

Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people’s sugar consumption while others think that it is individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It has been proved that sugar has a detrimental effect on the body and one should not consume sugar in excess. People vary in opinion about who should be responsible for controlling the consumption of sugar. A section of the society believes that the Governing body should have the responsibility to check on sugar consumption; while, some people believe that it should be controlled by individual efforts. However, I strongly support the former group as the Government has a wider scope of limiting the sugar in the country and has the authorization to make it difficult for individuals to consume it in excess.

To begin with, the government has full authority to control sugar utilization in the country. In other words, being an administrative body, he can pass the laws such that people may find difficulty on purchasing sugar in the market. This can be done by increasing tax on sugar production. Admittedly, due to the high price on sugary items, everyone would not find such items affordable and would look for other options. Unequivocally, a high tax would result in sugar production and a hike in sugar prices which would make it a less attractive choice among the people to buy and eat. Consequently, sugar consumption would decrease gradually in the population.

Another reason for making the government responsible for sugar consumption is because he has wider access to the country's population. The administrative department can bring awareness among the people more effectively as their advertisements or campaign reaches all the citizens across the country. In this way, higher authorities can make them aware of health hazards due to the over-consumption of sugar. For example, diseases like obesity and diabetes are caused due to excess sugar in the body.

However, there are people who see this situation differently and consider that instead of framing the government to have the responsibility of sugar consumption, individuals themselves should understand the harmful effect of eating too much sugary food. They believe that if the person cannot control his urge to eat the sugar then he will even buy it at an expensive price. Thus, self-control is must and this can be done by an individual himself and not the government.

In conclusion, I pen down saying that the government of the country is the prime body that can keep the check on sugar consumption in the country by making it less available in the market and running awareness programmes. Although the individual can control his sugar consumption by self-control, it is not possible for everyone to do this. Therefore, the best way to do this is by making the government responsible for limiting sugar control in the market.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2272.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 446.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09417040359 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02103399908 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464125560538 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.9 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.429059083 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379389701222 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1312593838 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646085128033 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229643165828 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382578848783 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.