The discussion whether the government should provide free education for everyone is still up for debate. While centuries ago more practical priorities had a major role in the daily life, nowadays citizens regard education as something they have a right to and, therefore something to be actively pursued. Moreover, it is a common belief that education should be completely free. The aim of this essay is to weigh the pros and cons of this stance and to propose solutions to correct some flaws.
Although education is a basic right, in still too many countries children, women, and low-income people cannot afford to attend a school, let alone a college. Sadly, this situation is quite common in developing countries and the high illiteracy percentage mirrors the characteristics widespread in those parts of the planet: corruption, lack of political vision, inefficiency. Plagued by those conditions, poor countries are often unable to guarantee even a basic level of education. As a consequence, the economy cannot keep up with other nations and an economic growth is virtually impossible.
On the other hand, developed countries have plenty of resources they can spend on education. Illiteracy is practically only a far memory from the past and children have the right to receive a complete and sound education. Nevertheless, other aspects should be taken into account. First, education has its price too. Although basic education is free in all the west countries, tertiary education is sometimes still prerogative of well-off families. For instance, fees college in the USA are so high, that in some cases students have to take a loan to cover the costs related to their studies. However, it is possible to receive a grant or aid government. This approach is usually widespread in European countries whose educational system is usually fund by fiscal revenue. Although the system is not entirely free since students have to pay some of the fees, accordingly to many observers, this is the best way to guarantee education for all without excessively burdening the government budget.
To conclude, the path followed by several European states seems to represents a reliable compromise between right to education and financial stability. Governments should therefore consider way to guarantee free or assisted access to education while supervising financial expense at the same time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 749, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'funded'.
Suggestion: funded
...ies whose educational system is usually fund by fiscal revenue. Although the system ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 841, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ntirely free since students have to pay some of the fees, accordingly to many observers, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'represent'.
Suggestion: represent
...wed by several European states seems to represents a reliable compromise between right to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2015.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31662269129 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92167962067 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575197889182 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9886413691 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.052631579 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207529801363 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636144840984 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686786255191 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12822568441 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718894610187 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.