Thanks to improvements in medical and scientific field, life expectancy has considerably increased. These days it is common to see people living up to 80 years with minor or no health problems at all. In developed countries high standards of living combined with economic stability allow citizens not only to have a successful career but also to face up illnesses once regarded as a deadly. However, concerns have risen about the side effects of living longer. It might sound weird to the ears of the most, but the economic impact of this trend can be devastating.
Attempt of elonging life has been around for centuries and the desider of immortality has its roots back to the early civilazations. In the middle age life expectancy was around 30 years, raised up to 55 at the beginning of the 20th century and for the year 2020 was 72 years, which represents a giant leap. Impressive progress in several fields, such as medicine, science, biology, chemistry have made it possibile for humans to age well. Yet many experts underline the potential negative consequences behind tendency and for good reason.
A higher life expectance is linked to higher costs as governments around the world have to pay pensions and subsidize the healthcare system to take care of the elderly. To address this demand governments traditionally rely on tax payers, which becomes more and more difficult when a growing percentage of the population gets older and does not work anymore. As a consequence public deficit grows, taxes go up and the economy shrinks. Solutions have been proposed like increasing retirement age which in turn might ignite another even worse problem: youth unemployment. In some countries like Italy or Spain 30% of the people aged between 15 and 24 is seeking for a job. Keeping at work people who should retire will only exarcebate a burning situation and not solve the problem of financial deficit at all. A more practical solution would be to cut on pensions and keep taxation low to boost the economy.
A solid, free economy is the backbone of a strong society where young adults have the possibility to build their own career and contribute to the economic growth of their country while retired can enjoy their spare time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...o to face up illnesses once regarded as a deadly. However, concerns have risen about the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94960212202 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70202347224 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618037135279 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4728694189 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.764705882 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82352941176 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266793954503 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659296839022 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397859580291 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132051566494 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484892084893 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.