The increase in people's life expectancy means that they have to work older to pay for their retirement. One alternative is that people start to work at a younger age. Is this alternative a positive or negative development?
Life expectancy has become the most concerning matter for the people after their retirement. While some individuals believe that they have to dedicate a few more years working, others think that starting a career at the early stage of life is a better option to increase life expectancy later. However, the latter option seems not to be a positive development.
To begin with, people do gain a slight benefits when they start working at young ages. Having a job early can help people strengthen their confidence significantly. Since they have a chance to encounter and experience the working environment sooner than the others, individuals develop the basic resolving skills for situations which could be useful for their other future occupations. Furthermore, people deserve to stop working after the age of 65 because they have contributed enough to the society by choosing to reallocate the extra working years to the early life. Thus, they find that working early will be more favorable.
Unfortunately, the setbacks of this alternative of working early is far more unbeneficial. Firstly, deciding to have a career too soon usually leads individuals to drop out from their studying. As a result, they lack fundamental knowledge to achieve high quality jobs which are potential to improve their life standards. Often, these people can only seek average occupations as taxi drivers, waiters, or normal accountants which create no significant assets as they expect. Secondly, working at young ages restricts the expanding of social experience. Instead of having opportunities to meet extraordinary people who are able to boost one’s career, the alternative choice limits all these chances.
In conclusion, people might need to consider sticking with the traditional way because working at young age could damage their life expectancy in the long term, especially when they retire.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39057239057 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86801101727 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612794612795 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9753787865 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.733333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466451881031 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142160880669 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613969296097 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268905558147 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407004079662 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.