In today's rapidly changing globalized world, due to standardization of society and increase in life expectancy people have to work older to maintain the same life after retirement. Experts suggest that the alternative of the situation is that people should start working in their early age. However both situations have its own advantages and disadvantages.
On the first hand, working in older age keeps you healthy and fit in long term therefore to maintain a good routine and fit body numerous of people prefer to work even after their retirement. Therefore working till old age for life expectancy is not an burden to them, its their first choice.
On the other hand, nevertheless, choosing a career in the early age has proven as a good decision in many peoples life. Juvenile could get right path at the early age and can start earning could bring significant changes in their life style. Moreover once they have experience at early age it will increase confidence in juvenile. On the other side of the coin we can see, people have burden to choose a good career at very early age of life. In order to achieve good experience in a preferred career, juvenile stop enjoying their life as they have to start earning at early age and have to gain experience so that they can stand in their society.
In my opinion, every individual is different, having different level of understanding and ability. If you are ready to earn money and start a career you should go ahead. There is detrimental effects if you acquire and achieve wrong career. Juvenile should take their own time to decide when they are ready to go ahead in real world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...hould start working in their early age. However both situations have its own advantages...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...er to work even after their retirement. Therefore working till old age for life expectanc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...working till old age for life expectancy is not an burden to them, its their firs...
^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ill old age for life expectancy is not an burden to them, its their first choice....
^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...e expectancy is not an burden to them, its their first choice. On the other ha...
^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ignificant changes in their life style. Moreover once they have experience at early age ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are detrimental effects'?
Suggestion: There are detrimental effects
...and start a career you should go ahead. There is detrimental effects if you acquire and achieve wrong career...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83098591549 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59587055527 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514084507042 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3467862425 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364637678244 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127288270103 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903574946158 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218467860218 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107999118514 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.