Email and text messaging have transformed communication but they are seriously threatening the status of written language. How far do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Over the last decade, Technology has introduced various ways of communication such as messaging and e-mails. While there are certain benefits of using these methods with respect to time and cost, I partly agree with the notion that these modes of interaction are threatening the status of written language in terms of understanding.
To begin with, the advance communication methods comes with unquestionable benefits in terms of speed and tariffs. Put differently, new ways have decreased the expenses and time for communicating locally and globally. For example, in earlier days, people use to write and send hand written notes, such as letters and telegrams, to their loved ones, which takes months to reach the destination. Moreover, telegrams were charged based on the number of words written in the note because those days, it was the faster mode than the letter, to deliver emergency messages using Morse codes. These hurdles are now overcome with the concept of text messages and electronic emails, as one can now communicate in minuscule of time and money.
On the contrary, these advanced techniques have threatened the written language in terms of its lucidity. Communicators have now started using the slang and abbreviated forms of sentences in emails and messages, which are hardly known to majority of people. Furthermore, invention of emoticons has also eliminated the requirement of expressing their sentiments linguistically. Other than this, the auto-correction facilities available while typing the messages and e-mails have made the writer unaware of usage of words, its meaning and its spellings. Grammerly, for instance, is a tool which highlights and corrects the spelling and grammatical errors, making the writer less conscious about the writing.
To sum up, new ways of communication have made easy for everyone to be in touch all the times with their loved one at very low costs. But, it has brought a certain set of threats to the written language with the introduction of new slang, graphic emoticons and auto-correction tools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...y. For example, in earlier days, people use to write and send hand written notes, s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32110091743 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96593836646 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577981651376 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4449427584 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214135804554 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701128960218 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408180528095 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13070423433 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278059679406 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.