Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree with this?
To survive in competitive world employees should have multiple skills and it varies from educational qualifications, work experience to personal qualities. During job selections few employers give preference on individual qualities and few choose them based on their educational and experience backgrounds. In my view an employee should be judged based on his or her overall positives sides.
To start with, most of the employers strictly goes with job seeker's past work experience and academic or technical degrees because in their mind only a skilled person can play the vital role in organization success.
Such kind of approach is very calculated and meets commercial aspects of company because they know certain important roles and duties must be tackled by well versed and intelligent person.
On the other hand, many interviews, give preference on personal qualities over degrees or experiences.
Owners who have made by themselves and established mammoth businesses and empires know very well personal qualities such as honestly, hardship, pleasing nature and ownership values are very rare in human beings. These qualities can not be earned by so-called certificates in fact its comes through by accomplishing milestones on daily basis.
To sum up, both approaches have their own reasons and justifications and it can confuse which way to be followed. In my fair opinion, employees should be judged based on mixture of all criteria. For instance, if a doctor has a bundle of degrees and work experience in medical field but on other hand he lacks in good interpersonal skills, honesty and dedication, he will not justify his roles and responsibilities. Hence employer's should consider all above mentioned points while selecting an employee.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on his or her overall positives sides. To start with, most of the employers str...
^^^
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the vital role in organization success. Such kind of approach is very calculated...
^^^
Line 6, column 416, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...justify his roles and responsibilities. Hence employers should consider all above men...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, honestly, if, so, well, while, for instance, in fact, kind of, such as, in my view, to start with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40510948905 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03734064975 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64598540146 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9418922783 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.416666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5833333333 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190419617109 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065301396877 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469625373744 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943266650055 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479811895175 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.