Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this competitive world, each and every employer is looking for a person who has interpersonal skills as well as qualification with field experience. I strongly opined that employee having both of these skills is very much imperative to survive in this cut-throat competition, from the spectacles of an employer.
To begin with, as industrialisation evolves at a rapid pace, it is likely to have employees who are honest not only to themselves but also to their employers. This quality has somewhat more weightage over other’s quality because employee ethics has a direct relation with the ability to learn new skills and gain required experience. For example, Reliance industry has been choosing employee by his or her personal qualities than the qualification and relevant experience. They also believe that other field related skills can be teachable, whereas personal qualities is the set of beliefs and it can not be reprogrammed as per employer needs. Nevertheless, I believe that, nowadays, qualification and experience is also needed in most of the engineering sectors to thrive, thus qualification and field experience does matter a lot.
On the other hand, employers can not fully forgo the special retirement of job role and therefore they are considering an employee’s degree and previous hands-on projects. Fields such as Information Technology, Automation Engineering very much require the excellent person to carry out a certain task. In these fields, employee selection is also based on employee’s accolades and a number of years relevant field experience. For example, IT companies are hiring a person totally based on their hands-on experience, plus they are less inclined towards their personal qualities as they have to pass most of their time on machines. Additionally, these employers also believe in a fact that when human interaction is not appreciable then personal qualities can be negotiable.
To conclude, I reiterate that both the qualities matters to get and maintain success. Personal qualities has its own worth but most occupations in today’s time require the field experience with affiliated college degrees.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47023809524 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1766257198 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9302468651 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 131.285714286 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19307756025 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713040060159 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051924492313 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118276809818 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350297823633 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.