Employers sometimes ask people applying for the job for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful others disagree.Discuss both these v

Essay topics:

Employers sometimes ask people applying for the job for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful others disagree.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Increasing competition among companies has left a little margin for error, urging them to invest huge amount of money in human resource department to higher the most suitable candidates to job. In order to do that some companies acquire information related to the personal life of potential employees, such as their area of interest, hobbies and marital status. Some people think that this information is suitable and helpful while others think otherwise. I tend to discuss both school of thoughts and share my opinion.
In the first place, people who hail from the first school of thought believe that a candidate’s personal organizational skills reflect on his professional life as well. For instance, a persona having constructive hobbies and positive interests would develop an optimistic approach in every aspect of life. This can be further explained by the example of a person, playing cricket as a hobby would have much better inter-personal skills compared to someone who consumes his spare time in playing video games. This information is quite helpful for recruiters to assign a particular role to the suitable candidate.
Furthermore, marital status of a person provides very vital information at times to the employers. An individual leading a successful married life shows the ability of emotional stability and would be best suitable for the roles requiring mature minded personnel. Seeking such information makes life of human resource people much easier.
On the flip-side of it, people who advocate the thought that asking for personal information does not help the cause often support their argument with the idea, that having in-depth details of professional and academic achievements available, of a potential employee, should be sufficient to decide the suitability of the candidates with the vacant position. So, employers need not to be concerned about what their employees do in their personal time?
As far as my personal opinion is concerned, I strongly believe that seeking the personal information helps the recruiters to streamline their search for a most appropriate candidate for the particular vacant position they have.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the best'.
Suggestion: be the best
...bility of emotional stability and would be best suitable for the roles requiring mature...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 382, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...vacant position. So, employers need not to be concerned about what their employees do...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...o in their personal time? As far as my personal opinion is concerned, I strongly believe that s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, for instance, such as, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40532544379 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94087751319 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57100591716 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.477966781 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315778015793 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106000551681 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403145896581 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176672152362 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289334879054 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.