Employers sometimes ask people applying for job for personal information such as their hobbies and interests. And whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both this views and give your own opinion.
While being interviewed for a position prospective employees are likely to be asked personal details as their passion and marital status. Although there are propounding the idea that such inquiries may be relevant, others however take the opposing view. In my opinion, I consider that both employers and the people working for them can build up a good rapport if they know each other as people rather than professionals.
On the one hand, advocates of this policy assert that knowing about the staff; employers are able to make judicious decision when necessary. In other words, this background knowledge can be employed astutely to launch bonus scheme for diligent and dedicated employees whose efforts deserve to be acknowledge and acclaimed. For instance, if a manager is aware that someone of staff members is passionate about sports, the can opt for free tickets to a sport event as an added incentive. Furthermore both employers and staff may even find a great deal of common ground.
On the other hand, others may simply interpret this as the very epitome of invasion of privacy. To clarify, some of people feel uncomfortable when they have to share any personal information about certain aspects of their life that they wish to keep for themselves. This is amply illustrated by a particular incident in ones’ past such as a bitter divorce, which anyone might be reluctant to talk about especially when the first encounters are concerned. Moreover, job seekers are likely to fear that they might be judged based on their background rather than their professional and marketable skills.
To conclude, while people may vary in their opinions, I think that any piece of information irrelevant to the professional context should not be hidden. This is mainly because the vast majority of people are willing to build up perfect impression and relationship with managers based on shearing personal information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...to a sport event as an added incentive. Furthermore both employers and staff may even find ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the people') or simply say ''some people''.
Suggestion: some of the people; some people
...ome of invasion of privacy. To clarify, some of people feel uncomfortable when they have to sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, i think, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16025641026 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7921284466 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4793066245 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.846153846 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391163258507 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124640548051 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475983318692 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227480237779 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487384079344 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.