Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interest, and whether they are married or single.
Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many organizations ask new job applicants to provide their personal information, such as their likes, dislikes, and marital status. These facts about people could be helpful for employers to determine the level of individuals whereas others do not agree with this fact. In this essay, I will discuss both the views with my personal opinion and relevant examples.
To start with, personal details of the people are widely used by companies to determine the important facts about them before hiring. Nevertheless, many employers use this data to authenticate their details and rule out any fraud, which could happen after the hiring of the applicant. So, it plays a vital role in selecting the right candidate for job positions. In many multinational companies, for instance, the human-resources department mainly responsible for collecting these personal details and they further check scrutiny of the information provided to them. Thus, the facts collected by companies seem to be helpful.
On the other hand, a small number of people also think that it will not use for employers. They could have a bad experience in the past. Nonetheless, they could have faced some kinds of problems related to information leakage. To solve these kinds of problems, employers should create some strict policies to avoid these kinds of privacy violations. In the past few years, for example, private information has been leaked by some of the popular social media companies, such as Facebook, Twitter, and Whatsup.
In my opinion, these types of personal information are very helpful for employers to find out the right candidates for higher positions. If this factual information is appropriately used then they could find out some pivotal insights about the candidate. To illustrate, nowadays, many organisations use analytical tools to analyze this personal information to determine the potential of an individual.
To sum up, the personal details asked by employers could be used properly to find out some factual information rather than misuse of it. I strongly believe in this fact that it would be more helpful in the upcoming future as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
..., I will discuss both the views with my personal opinion and relevant examples. To start with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...em to be helpful. On the other hand, a small number of people also think that it will not use ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... private information has been leaked by some of the popular social media companies, such as...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... right candidates for higher positions. If this factual information is appropriate...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, then, thus, well, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to start with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27777777778 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8719002929 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546783625731 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6993057538 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.277777778 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32905136477 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100054710053 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527210798185 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191493239959 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732544132241 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.