Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interest, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In our newfangled society, Employment prospects are so alleviated that getting a exemplary job has become a momentous aim of one's life. Sometimes employers ask for personal information in addition of their expertise which many people found relevant however some impose that characteristics data is of no use for them. I totally accede with former notion and try to elaborate my perception on this topic as well as both the views.
The first and the foremost, Employers always wants a perfect fit for particulars chores, So they always need all paramount data in a job-seeker. For instance, mostly MNC's always trying to get all momentous information which help them to identify how well-versed the employee is in his/her flourishing carrier. Each employer wants a employee to support the lucrative ways in the progression of the community. I also believe this way employers can get a ideal candidate for given job.
In contrast, Aspirants find this activity exasperating as they are unable to find any direct relation of this process. Employee's thoughts are that they must selected on the know-how of their field not on their personal data. To illustrate, Even after clearing IAS exams, contenders finds its interviews process are the toughest one's. As competition is pervasive, so its panel's duty to consider the most eligible professional for this. However, many found it a farrago process apparently to neglect those one who can afterwards culminate their chores with efficacy.
To recapitulate the aforementioned views, I do believe that private information of a person also helps employers to find a good nominee which tempts a laudable initiative even in employer's deteriorated situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rospects are so alleviated that getting a exemplary job has become a momentous ai...
^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...plary job has become a momentous aim of ones life. Sometimes employers ask for perso...
^^^^
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'characteristics'' or 'characteristic's'?
Suggestion: characteristics'; characteristic's
...found relevant however some impose that characteristics data is of no use for them. I totally a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...lourishing carrier. Each employer wants a employee to support the lucrative ways ...
^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...also believe this way employers can get a ideal candidate for given job. In co...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, however, if, so, well, for instance, in addition, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28782287823 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01406677452 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634686346863 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7922361247 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.230769231 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246658304952 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081465424318 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736420724249 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143200047793 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679597358098 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.