Generally, recruiters enquire the candidates about their favourite pastime and marital status while they recruit new employees. Is this information really necessary? In my opinion, these details help employers in knowing the candidates much better in a more meaningful way. This essay will discuss both the aspect and provide reasons why personal information is useful to the respective people.
Few say that taking information like timepass activities or marital status from the employees does not make any difference, as finally, they will not add any value to the organization. Moreover, they contend that at last performance of an individual alone matters to the organization and neither personal pursuits nor the family details. Although, individual performances matters, I refute with the view that this information does not contribute any useful thing to the companies.
Employers extract personal details from the interviewees for various reasons. Firstly, obtaining details of interest and hobbies will aid management in analysing the candidate's interpersonal skills, socializing skills and other personal traits. For example, a person who is more interested in following and playing cricket or football would probably be a good team player. Secondly, information as to whether the employee is married or unmarried help the employers to assess the employee's flexibility with regards to relocations and his personal responsibilities, as normally unmarried person, will be more flexible for location shifts in comparison.
In conclusion, though the performance of an individual does matters as others argue, details of an employees relating to his or her extra-curricular activities and if they are married or unmarried is useful to the companies in many ways, because unless an organization knows about its employees personal information, it cannot be able to provide him or her a better place to work in order to retain good talents. Hence, to do that personal information is rather important to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...good team player. Secondly, information as to whether the employee is married or unmarried he...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...arried help the employers to assess the employees flexibility with regards to relocations...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an employee' or simply 'employees'?
Suggestion: an employee; employees
...oes matters as others argue, details of an employees relating to his or her extra-curricular...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s matters as others argue, details of an employees relating to his or her extra-c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57980456026 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12510119307 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57003257329 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.221192606 49.4020404114 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.769230769 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216448765138 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777921328801 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369307082216 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122587064971 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456480498558 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.