Technology has changed the way people learn today. Some people say that reading is the most effective way to acquire knowledge when compared to TV or video lectures. To my knowledge, both options have their own advantages and disadvantages. Thus an effective way to education always depending upon the type of subject that is being taught and individuals ability to perceive the ideas behind the subject that is being imparted.
It is an undeniable fact that reading is the most traditional and proven way of learning things. People who advocate it says that books are the treasure of knowledge, that is, such in-depth details can never be obtained anywhere. Besides, it is also been emphasized by various research reports that while reading brain stores the acquired information for more time than the other mode of studying such as videos. Typically, a bright student who has the acumen to understand the tricky concepts and monotonous theories generally do not find fault with reading.
On the other hand, in the current digital world, the way of educating the pupil has dramatically changed. Certainly, video lessons are boon to those who do not have time to spend time reading the whole theory and slow learners. As a matter of fact, nowadays, schools use projectors to impart subject knowledge to children as much as they use blackboards. For instance, explaining theories through visual representation makes it easier for students to grasp even difficult concepts quickly. As a result, it will help teachers to make the students understand the technical details better by preparing videos with pictures, diagrams, and graphs.
In conclusion, both ways of learning things have their own traits. The difficulty level and the intricacies of the idea that is being taught and the personnel abilities of the students determine the best mode of imparting skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...their own advantages and disadvantages. Thus an effective way to education always de...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18151815182 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74847553892 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594059405941 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8749562343 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940348539331 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275891549803 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400676233333 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0506244986391 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373742475829 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.