Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal questions, such as hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single, some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion?
Few individuals support the idea to include questions regarding personal life in an interview would be resourceful and worthy to be asked by organizations conducting those interviews, however, there are some who believes otherwise. In my view, including questions related to an individual's daily life is as significant as other academic questions because it allows the interviewers to assess the soft skills of that person.
On one hand, the most compelling reason to support this kind of questions in the interview is that it gives a bigger picture to the company to evaluate the candidate on inter-personal skills as well. Nowadays, companies prefer people with more soft skills than academic skills because working in teams and dealing with all kinds of people in daily routine would require skills such as patience and adequate communication. To illustrate, an employee with tech-savvy nature would serve as a multi-skilled employee which could help in IT matters as well. Without asking questions to know liking and disliking, the employer would not be able to find these skills.
On the other hand, some people would argue that questions related to personality would not represent the proper view of the factors, such as education and experience with the related field, important for hiring. Some technical jobs require a specific set of skills from the employee, in this case, focusing more on duties related question would undoubtedly benefit the company. Another reason to oppose the idea of the personal question is that there are few people who feel offended when questions related to their private life are asked during the interview. They are not comfortable in sharing such information. For instance, asking the marital status of a candidate during the interview might make the employee angry and by that company might lose a talented employee.
To conclude, questions to know character-based skills of an employee should be a part of any efficient interview but to keep it safe, a consent before asking such private questions should be taken from employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...my view, including questions related to an individuals daily life is as significant as other a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, well, for instance, kind of, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25225225225 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84559215138 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.5791459003 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.75 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17490101779 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729016942984 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370523432847 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107816999603 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04568361665 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.