The end of the world s fossil fuel resources and the subsequent changes will be a positive development in society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

The end of the world’s fossil fuel resources and the subsequent changes will be a positive development in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Advances in our society are anticipated by reaching the end of the earth’s finite resources like fossil fuel. Maybe it seems ambitiously at first sight as almost everything around us has a tie with fossil fuel and crude oil, but I strongly advocate this statement and will discuss it.

Undoubtedly, lesser reliance and consumption on fossil fuels and its derivatives will reduce the climate crisis and health issues in our society. Lowering every ton of greenhouse gas emissions prevents the global temperature from reaching the limits of global warming, polar melting, sea-level rising, droughts and extreme heatwaves. In addition to reducing planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions, restricting burning fossil fuels also reduces generating localized air pollutants such as soot and smog, decreasing the risk of death of stroke, heart disease, lung cancer and respiratory illness among those exposed.

Another positive development would be that the money spent on drilling and exploiting crude oil has to be put into industries developing renewable sources of energy and electric vehicles. Renewable energy is energy that is collected from renewable resources that are naturally replenished, such as rain, sunlight, wind, waves and geothermal heat. For instance, some nations like Norway, in 2021, known for its production of hydroelectricity, consumed hydro energy worth half of its total energy supply. In addition, transport accounts for around one-fifth of global emissions. At the same time, Electric vehicles are two to three times more efficient than conventional gasoline-powered vehicles and have no emissions at the tailpipe.

In conclusion, I strongly agree with the statement that the changes from reducing reliance on fossil fuels will be positive. Either on our health and environment or on energy sources and vehicles.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6164874552 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96831760732 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641577060932 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9688696277 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.583333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214589175269 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783605653424 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957837772341 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151403305807 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891329213744 0.056905535591 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.