Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree?
Educational systems play a crucial role in training all kinds of skills. I agree with the statement, which says that too much time is devoted to teaching theoretical knowledge rather than hands-on skills at all educational levels.
Although teaching methods in top-ranked universities have been altered in recent years, an enormous amount of institutes around the world still use old-school methods. The old-school teaching method means that students only learn by reading, writing, and listening instead of practical courses. By this method, children can only recall concepts for a limited amount of time, and when it comes to applying that knowledge at work, they have forgotten it. Consequently, a considerable number of graduated students are not able to solve a problem related to their education. For instance, someone who graduated in mechanical engineering could not repair even a minor issue in their vehicle.
In addition, a lack of teaching soft skills would have critical implications. For instance, the basic need of every person who wants to have a career is the ability to make a good communication. To put it more simply, consider youngsters who are applying for a job but could not even crack the first stage of interviews, which is the ability to discuss with others. Companies do not find candidates as per the job description. During that time, It shows the real difference between companies' demand and the education which they have conceived.
To conclude, I agree with the argument that much time is being spent on cramming instead of experimental learning because of the current structure of teaching and paying less attention to vital skills. Unfortunately, this overemphasis on theory prevents students from acquiring fundamental world skills.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, still, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32740213523 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92079560609 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5092342603 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.928571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187959776726 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561150385644 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619383240266 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117134043038 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633934069953 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.