The end of the world’s fossil fuel resources and the subsequent changes will be a positive development in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people believe that the complete depletion of natural resources like fossil fuels and natural gas will have a positive impact on our surroundings. I completely agree with this view. This essay will argue why using alternative forms of fuels positively influences this planet.
To begin with, there are some developing countries that cannot quit using fossil fuels. Primarily, this is because such countries are entirely dependent on such natural resources and cannot survive without them. They have limited funds and have access to such kinds of fuels. Like, India and Pakistan use diesel and petrol to smoothly run their business affairs of the country. Although these countries are well-aware of the lethal consequences of burning fossil fuels, they cannot afford other forms of power sources and thus have to use the available resources.
On the other hand, a growing number of people, including me, believe that society will witness a positive trend when the supply of natural resources will fall down. Admittedly, fossil fuels release harmful gases, which have a detrimental impact on our environment. Such gases like carbon dioxide and nitrogen are known to affect the ozone layer, which protects our planet from dangerous rays. Therefore, analysts have discovered alternate forms of energy like solar and wind energy, which is a clean forms of energy and can be used to run machinery and vehicles. If such forms of power are used by nations, then our environment would be pollution-free and there would be fewer airborne diseases. So, this trend can bring a massive change in our surroundings.
To conclude, while some opine that the shortage of fossil fuels and using other environment-friendly resources can positively influence human life, others do not favor this. However, I think that such practices will completely end pollution from this world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, i think, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28859060403 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69452848602 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4379946015 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245801814253 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853667911593 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639806572751 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169597694824 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740357671915 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.