Essay topics: Some people argue that technological inventions such as mobile phones are making people specially less interactive.
Do you agree or disagree
In the rampant technological era, it revolutionised the human existence at mobile phone is also the gift of technology people. Some people assert that with the advent of mobile phones, it impacts positively in the way of interaction while other condemn about this statement. I agree with you for my statement which I will portray in the following paragraphs.
There are innumerable reason which are propitious to my viewpoint. The pre-dominant reason is that it makes the people more closer as compare to the primitive time. In the past time, if person wants to communicate with other than they use the gestures, letters and other sign which takes a lot of time of reply. But with the mobile phone, it eradicate this problem from the face of earth. People can now communicate in the fraction of a second with the person who may be sitting anywhere in the words. In addition, it becomes the integral part of the modern world and the invention off it shrank the word and man felt well-connected with far off places. It rectify the way of communication, nowadays calling rates are also very cheap last but not least, people can easily interact with the ministers and other persons to wipingout the world from social programmes such as pollution which is a big issue which is prevailing in all over the world. Because some tech-savvy ministers have begun to use the popular social networking and microblogging sites such as Twitter which is very popular in these days.
In the paradoxical side, it is some bad impact which adversely affect the human life. Premarily, nowadays youngsters spend their lot of time on the mobile phones by playing games on them and doing chatting with their friends. They have no interest in their family matters they are very busy in their special life which create hurdles and the aftermath of these will effect their whole family.
To recapitulate, everyone has their own views I do not deny any of them but cogitate that with the arrival of mobile phone, people interact with each other easily. Although it has some cons but it these should be eradicated if the parents little more focus on their childrens
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...nant reason is that it makes the people more closer as compare to the primitive time. In th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...is that it makes the people more closer as compare to the primitive time. In the p...
^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...s compare to the primitive time. In the past time, if person wants to communicate with ot...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'eradicates'?
Suggestion: eradicates
...of reply. But with the mobile phone, it eradicate this problem from the face of earth. Pe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rectifies'?
Suggestion: rectifies
... well-connected with far off places. It rectify the way of communication, nowadays call...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...hurdles and the aftermath of these will effect their whole family. To recapitulate,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, well, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8446866485 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60894878345 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544959128065 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.905826684 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.125 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0625 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193659303152 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639543806851 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433849609803 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124952891847 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448418140679 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.