Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The world is composed of various countries and each country represents the different culture and uses various languages. Some people opine that nowadays, with a continuous annual extinction of languages, life has become convenient whereas others hold the notion that language represents a tradition and its significance shouldn’t be demolished. In my opinion, few languages have caused an ease in life and made survival effortless in this globalized era. In this essay, I will discuss both the viewpoints.
Limitation of languages has resulted in many advantages. First and foremost, it is very easy to communicate with fewer languages. For example, in large multinational companies, generally employees communicate in the English language, most of the workers are proficient in this universal language, thus results in effective interaction. Moreover, it’s easy to be proficient in lesser language rather than learning basics of various languages. Therefore, lesser languages have played a pivotal role in global connection and have increased various opportunities in many aspects.
On the flip side, with modernization, the importance of local language and culture is getting affected. For instance, in developing countries like India, school curriculum is giving importance to English language and students are forgetting their local language and native culture. Thus, life has become easier but the importance of rich local heritage is getting vanished.
To recapitulate, I strongly believe that the positive outcomes of lesser languages have outweighed the negative consequences. However, a government of each country should also make individual efforts by promoting their rich heritage, so that the importance of local language remains intact.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83783783784 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1142293257 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598455598456 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1548768796 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244446496407 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822402260594 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370472208009 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139421201502 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460118862566 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.