Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Languages play a vital role to communicate. Some languages have abolished over the last few years and some people think it should not be a matter of concern. In my opinion, few languages will combat communication gap amongst the nations. This essay will elicit pros and cons of few languages in the world.
To commence, a language is an integral part of any nation. When people communicate in the same language it reduces the communication errors and convey the right message. For instance, in a country where all the people talk in English the trade and trait process becomes easier. In addition, less languages around the world will promote migration and lead people to better prospects as well as job opportunities in life. For example, if all the countries educate their people with basic English and French language their chances of employment will increase in rest of the world.
However, there are few short-comings to it. Some people have sentimental attachments to their native language which might lead to internal conflicts. To illustrate, in India there have been arguments over the Sanskrit language as it has lost its importance even though it was considered that all the languages derived from Sanskrit. Moreover, there will be a loss of literature and art as well. For instance, Urdu is considered to be a language of poets but it will lose its usage if only few languages persists.
To conclude, it is clearly observed that pros are more impactful then the cons. Hence, the government should insist on implying laws to teach more common languages rather than the regional ones. This will also diminish language barriers amongst the nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun languages is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...it process becomes easier. In addition, less languages around the world will promote...
^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...y observed that pros are more impactful then the cons. Hence, the government should ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04710144928 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71001656287 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56884057971 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6947954799 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9411764706 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336024174837 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107254550379 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640551150633 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202535946254 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661894841479 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.