Facing many international pollution issues such as the energy shortage and global warming, some people believe that individuals have limited abilities to deal with that issue, compared with the nations and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Global warming and the limitation of renewable energy resources is mainly a serious concern worldwide. However, it is a debatable topic that government is more efficient rather than people to cope with this problem. I completely agree with the given statement, let us examine it in detail in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, the government is in charge of every energy source provided to their citizens such as electricity and fossil. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the government to limit the use of the available resources and find the alternate environment friendly renewable resources. To illustrate, in the Netherlands the government is working on the enormous solar plant which will reduce half of the electricity consumption produced by coal plants. Moreover, this will be advantageous to combat air pollution caused by burning fossil fuels for the production of electricity.
On the other hand, people do not have many options available to participate in this cause on a larger scale. Thus, a few activities can surely helpful namely carpooling or use of public transport will intensify the government to deal with global warming. To dive deeper, the less utilization of private vehicles means low emission and limited utilization of diesel and petrol cars. Additionally, turning off the lights and other electric equipment when no one is at home will save some energy too.
To conclude, undoubtedly a collaboration effort from both the government and people is required to handle the global warming and energy shortage problem. Whereas, the government has to play a vital role due to the sources are more capable to resolve an issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...detail in the subsequent paragraphs. First and foremost, the government is in...
^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in this cause on a larger scale. Thus, a few activities can surely helpful name...
^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...deeper, the less utilization of private vehicles means low emission and limited utilizat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...al warming and energy shortage problem. Whereas, the government has to play a vital rol...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s are more capable to resolve an issue.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, whereas, as to, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2734082397 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99253983194 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625468164794 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.9369726542 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.307692308 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192604214019 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609050033955 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383215567762 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110852475512 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459499597881 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.